Skip to main content

True Power Systems35 sites, one lead pipelineLexington, Kentucky, 2026

Two engineers in February. Eight in September. $1M in work from the web.

True Power Systems is a service-disabled veteran-owned electrical engineering firm, PE-licensed in 24 states. When it came to us, its whole website was one GoDaddy page that said Launching Soon. We built the firm site, then a power-studies site for every state it's licensed in, then an MEP design site for ten of them: 35 sites feeding one lead pipeline. Six months in, TPS traces $1M in signed work to leads from those sites.

signed work TPS traces to web leads
$1M
monthly revenue since February 1
4x
engineers on staff
2 to 8
live sites, one Sonor pipeline
35

Revenue, headcount, and signed work are TPS's own figures, reported by Scott Mann, its Director of Business Development, on September 25, 2026. Every other number on this page we measured ourselves.

What we did

Built truepowersystems.com, 54 pages, in six weeks. Then 24 state power-studies sites and 10 MEP design sites, each network forked from one template with one config file per state. Every site has its own managed form, and all 35 land in a single Sonor project with the originating site attached.

Why

TPS can stamp drawings in 24 states, and a facilities manager in Georgia doesn't go looking for a firm in Kentucky. Engineering buyers search the service and the state, and they judge a firm by whether its page knows their regulator, their utility, and their code edition.

What it changed

Between February and September the firm went from two engineers to eight, and its monthly revenue quadrupled. TPS traces $1M in signed work to leads that came in through these sites, and most of the form inquiries didn't arrive through the main site at all.

01The starting line

A 24-state firm with a one-page website

Ben True, P.E., founded True Power Systems in Lexington in 2024 after eight years in power and energy engineering. By 2026 the firm held Professional Engineer licenses in 24 states, SDVOSB status, a SAM.gov registration, government master service agreements, and a distributor program that bundles power studies with switchgear and generator sales. On February 1 it had two engineers.

It also had a website that said Launching Soon. truepowersystems.com was a single GoDaddy Website Builder page: an 87KB document with about 780 characters of visible text and one internal link, pointing back at itself. Every buyer who heard the name from a distributor, a general contractor, or a procurement list and went to check found nothing to check.

So the first build was the one a prequalification reviewer needs. Services, markets, the team with their credentials, and the government identifiers (UEI, CAGE, NAICS) right in the hero, because a public buyer checks those before anything else. Fifty-four pages in six weeks: 13 service pages, 7 market pages, 24 state pages, three category hubs, and the core pages, including the government MSA page. It went live on May 12.

  • Before: one page, one internal link, and it linked to itself
  • After: 54 pages, every one in the sitemap returning 200
  • UEI, CAGE, and NAICS above the fold, where a public buyer looks first
The truepowersystems.com hero: Where Power Becomes Predictable, over a substation photograph, with VOSB and SDVOSB status, SAM.gov registration, NAICS, and UEI in a row beneath the buttons

truepowersystems.com at first paint. The government identifiers sit in the hero because a public buyer checks them before anything else.

The coverage block: PE-licensed in 24 states, headquartered in Lexington, with the six most active states listed beside the Government MSA and Distributor Program cards

The coverage block names the six most active states and links to all 24. Each one also has its own site.

The services section: power system studies, engineering and design, and construction-phase support, each service card linking to its own page

Studies, design, and construction support on one page, each linking to its own service page. Scroll the frame for the whole section.

02The state network

Where the stamp is, the site is

One firm site can't rank in 24 states. The people who buy arc flash, short-circuit, and coordination studies search the service with their state attached, and the firms that come up are local. So the next day, Ohio got its own site: ohiopowerstudies.com. By June 13 every state TPS is licensed in had one, 24 in all, from Alabama to Wisconsin.

All of them come from one template, and forking a state means changing one file. That's what keeps the network maintainable. It's also the fastest way to build a doorway network, which is the thing search engines punish: the same page, over and over, with the place name swapped. We treated that as the main design problem, not an afterthought.

The answer is that each state's file holds that state's actual power landscape. The Ohio site knows Ohio sits inside PJM, that AEP Ohio, FirstEnergy, AES Ohio, and Duke Energy Ohio serve it, and that with no state OSHA plan, Ohio employers answer to federal OSHA. The Texas site knows ERCOT carries about 90% of Texas load, that the Panhandle sits in SPP, Beaumont in MISO, and El Paso in the Western Interconnection. Each site also carries its state's BLS establishment counts by sector and its own FAQ. A doorway page swaps the city name. These swap the grid.

One rule came from the client: these sites are concept-driven. No named clients, no named projects, ever. That rules out the easy proof, so the depth has to come from knowing the state, which is harder to fake and, it turns out, more convincing to an engineer.

  • 24 states, 24 domains, one template, one config file per state
  • Ohio answers to PJM and federal OSHA; Texas to ERCOT, SPP, MISO, and WECC
  • No named clients or projects, by client rule
The ohiopowerstudies.com hero: Ohio Power System Studies, with the PE license status and a quote button

ohiopowerstudies.com, the prototype. It went live the day after the firm site.

The Grid We Engineer For in Ohio: PJM Interconnection, federal OSHA jurisdiction, the Public Utilities Commission of Ohio, and AEP Ohio, FirstEnergy, AES Ohio, and Duke Energy Ohio
The Grid We Engineer For in Texas: ERCOT for most of the state, SPP in the Panhandle, MISO in the far east, WECC in El Paso, the Public Utility Commission of Texas, and Oncor, CenterPoint, AEP Texas, TNMP, Austin Energy, CPS Energy, and El Paso Electric

Same template, same section, different grid. Ohio sits in PJM with no state OSHA plan. Texas is mostly ERCOT, with SPP, MISO, and WECC at the edges. That's the difference between a network and a doorway.

Every state TPS is licensed in has a power-studies site, and 10 of them also have an MEP site. 34 microsites in all, behind one firm site.

03The MEP network

A website that reads like a drawing set

In August we built a second network, for TPS's mechanical, electrical, and plumbing design work, and the audience changed. Power studies are bought by facility owners. MEP design is bought by architects and developers, people who spend their working day reading construction documents. So the 10 MEP sites, live since August 14, don't look like marketing sites. Each one is a drawing set.

Every section is a sheet with a heavy border and a title strip: sheet number, title, state, issue, firm. The cover sheet carries a real sheet index. G-001 is the code summary, M-101 the services schedule, then the legend, keynotes, and general notes, and the contact form is T-001, the transmittal. An architect knows how to read it before they've read a word.

The code summary is the sheet that matters. An architect searching Kentucky mechanical code is searching for an edition, and a wrong edition on an engineering site is a liability. Third-party code aggregators got Kentucky wrong three ways: they claimed the 2018 IMC (it's the 2015), NEC 2017 (it's 2023), and a 2018 International Plumbing Code for a state that writes its own plumbing code under 815 KAR Chapter 20. So every edition on every MEP site was read from the state's own publication, and each sheet is stamped with the date it was verified and a link to the source.

The drawing-set template is also the fastest thing in the network: mep-oh.com scores 91 on mobile Lighthouse, the median of three runs, with zero layout shift.

  • Sheet G-001, the code summary: every edition from the state's own publication
  • Aggregators had Kentucky's IMC, NEC, and plumbing code all wrong
  • The contact form is sheet T-001, the transmittal
The mep-oh.com cover sheet: OHIO in heavy condensed type over Mechanical, Electrical, Plumbing, a sheet index from G-001 to T-001, and a title block with PE licensure, DVOSB procurement IDs, and the code authority

mep-oh.com: the cover sheet, with a working sheet index and a title block carrying the PE status, procurement IDs, and code authority.

Sheet G-001, the Ohio code summary: adopted editions for building, mechanical, plumbing, electrical, energy, fuel gas, accessibility, and existing buildings, with ASHRAE climate zones and a title strip reading verified 2026-08-13

Sheet G-001 for Ohio. Every edition was read from Ohio Administrative Code 4101, and the title strip says when it was verified.

Kentucky's code summary sheet: the 2018 Kentucky Building Code, the 2015 International Mechanical Code, the state-written Kentucky State Plumbing Code under 815 KAR Chapter 20, and the 2023 National Electrical Code

Kentucky's G-001: the 2015 IMC, the 2023 NEC, and a state-written plumbing code. Aggregators had all three wrong.

The drawing set, live and loaded on request. Scroll it and the sheets stack like a set on a desk.

04One pipeline

35 front doors, one inbox

A network this size is only useful if TPS can tell which doors people come through. All 35 sites run on one Sonor project with one API key, and each has its own managed form with its own slug. Every submission is stamped with the host it came from, so the business development team works one queue and still sees that a lead came from Maryland rather than the main site.

The forms don't use CAPTCHA. Sonor only accepts a submission that carries proof a browser actually rendered the page, which stops the bots that post straight at the endpoint without asking a real buyer to pick out traffic lights.

Here's what that pipeline has logged since June 1: 20 form inquiries that passed spam screening. Six came through truepowersystems.com. The other 14 came through 12 different microsites, from Georgia and North Carolina to Washington and Oklahoma. That's 70% of the form inquiries arriving through a door that didn't exist in April.

Forms aren't the whole funnel, and we won't pretend they are. Every site carries TPS's phone number, and calls and direct emails aren't in these counts. Nor is every inquiry a qualified lead. The count shows where people came in, not what they bought.

  • 35 managed forms, one Sonor project, every lead tagged with its host
  • 14 of 20 form inquiries came through a microsite
  • No CAPTCHA: Sonor wants proof the page rendered instead
Form inquiries, June 1 to September 25
Came in throughSitesInquiries
truepowersystems.com16
Power-studies sites1012
MEP sites22
Total20

Submissions that passed spam screening, from Sonor's form records. Phone calls and direct emails aren't counted.

Sheet T-001, the transmittal: a fee proposal request addressed to True Power Systems, attention Scott Mann, with firm, role, project type, scope, location, and project description fields beside his direct line

Sheet T-001, the transmittal, is the contact form. Its submissions land in the same Sonor queue as every other site's, tagged mep-oh.com.

truepowersystems.com on a phone
ohiopowerstudies.com on a phone
mep-oh.com on a phone

One of each network on a phone: the firm site, a power-studies site, and an MEP drawing set.

What TPS says happened

On February 1, True Power Systems had two engineers. In September it hired its eighth. Scott Mann, who runs business development for the firm, puts monthly revenue at four times what it was in February and expects five times by year end. And TPS traces $1M in signed work, in six months, to leads that came in through these sites.

We didn't do all of that, and we'd rather say so than have you wonder. The February baseline predates the first site's launch by more than three months. Scott's business development work was running the whole time, and TPS had to hire, train, and deliver the work. What the sites did is narrower and easier to check: they put a two-engineer firm in front of buyers in 24 states who had no way to find it, gave each of them a page that knows their grid or their code edition, and routed every inquiry into one queue with its source attached. The $1M is the part of the growth TPS attributes to that. It's the number we'd point to.

signed work traced to web leads
$1MTPS's figure, six months
monthly revenue since February 1
4xTPS's figure; 5x expected by year end
engineers on staff
2 to 8TPS's figure, February to September
live sites
351 firm site, 24 power studies, 10 MEP
pages on the firm site
54it replaced one
form inquiries came via a microsite
14 of 20passed spam screening, June 1 to September 25
Accessibility, Best Practices, SEO
100 / 100 / 100truepowersystems.com, Lighthouse mobile, three of three runs
mobile performance, drawing-set template
91mep-oh.com, Lighthouse median of three, zero layout shift

The network is live: truepowersystems.com (opens in a new tab), and the evidence behind each number is below.

The evidence behind the results

Signed work traced to web leads: 1,000,000 USD

The value of work True Power Systems has signed with clients whose first contact came through truepowersystems.com or one of its 34 microsites, as TPS counts it, over the six months to September 25, 2026.

Period: March 25, 2026 to September 25, 2026. No prior baseline; this is an absolute result.

TPS's own figure, reported to us in conversation; we haven't seen the contracts. It's signed work, not revenue collected, and the attribution is TPS's judgment of where each client first came from. The six-month window is how TPS framed it, so the start date here is approximate.

Reported by Scott Mann, Director of Business Development, True Power Systems, September 25, 2026

Monthly revenue, indexed to February 2026 = 100: 400 index

True Power Systems' monthly revenue in September 2026 relative to February 2026. Published as an index because TPS's dollar figures are its own business.

Period: September 1, 2026 to September 25, 2026. Baseline: 100 index, February 1, 2026 to February 28, 2026.

TPS's own figure, reported in conversation and not audited by us. The growth has several causes, including TPS's own business development and hiring; the websites are one of them. TPS expects the index to reach 500 by the end of 2026, which is a projection, not a result.

Reported by Scott Mann, Director of Business Development, True Power Systems, September 25, 2026

Form inquiries that passed spam screening: 20 inquiries

Submissions to the 35 sites' Sonor managed forms that weren't flagged as spam, counted by the site each came from: 6 through truepowersystems.com, 12 through 10 different power-studies sites, and 2 through 2 MEP sites. 14 of the 20, or 70%, came through a microsite.

Period: June 1, 2026 to September 25, 2026. No prior baseline; this is an absolute result.

Forms only: phone calls and direct emails aren't included. Passing spam screening doesn't make an inquiry qualified, and some may be vendors or out-of-scope requests. Submissions have carried the site they came from since late May 2026, so the count starts June 1.

Sonor form records for the True Power Systems project, counted by Upforge on September 25, 2026
Start here

35 sites was TPS's answer. What's yours?

This one needed a firm site, then a site for every state the firm can stamp in, then a second network for a new line of work. Yours will need something else. Tell us what you're building, or get a free written audit of what you already have.